Self-definition

Calendar

««Nov 2009»»
SMTWTFS
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930

Blue Devilish Blogs

It's a Midwestern Thing

It's a Southern Thing

It's a British Thing

Latest Entries per Category

Flickr - Latest Photos

scandalofparticularity

Research on prayer

posted Sunday, 10 October 2004

This article in the NY Times, and other things I've read about scientific studies on prayer, all completely miss one big point.

It seems as if most studies are set up with those who are sick divided into two groups - those who are being prayer for and those who aren't.  None of them know which group they've been assigned to.  Then, a group of people are given the names of one group and told to pray for them.  If the prayed-for group heals faster, that supposedly means prayer "works" or something like that.

Here's what they're missing:  all sick people, all over the world, are prayed for constantly.  It is impossible to place a sick person in a not-prayed for group, because that person is already being prayed for.  Think about it.  Did you pray today in church for all those who are sick?  I bet you did.  All who are sick.  And if you didn't, somewhere there's a group of nuns or monks or someone else who did. 

I'd be willing to make the claim that every single person alive today has been prayed for, by someone else, whether they know it or not.  We pray generalized prayers all the time - Lord, have mercy on all those who suffer in body, mind or spirit....Lord, we lift up the people of Iraq, Sudan, and all those in places ravaged by violence...

From the article:  "...many churchgoers are skeptical that prayer can be subjected to scientific scrutiny. For one thing, prayers vary in their purpose and content: some give praise, others petition for strength, many ask only that God's will be done. For another, not everyone sees God as one who does favors on request.

"There's no way to put God to the test, and that's exactly what you're doing when you design a study to see if God answers your prayers," said the Rev. Raymond J. Lawrence Jr., director of pastoral care at New York-Presbyterian Hospital/Columbia University Medical Center. "This whole exercise cheapens religion, and promotes an infantile theology that God is out there ready to miraculously defy the laws of nature in answer to a prayer."

I'd agree with all of that except the 'defy the laws of nature' part, if by that he means God is restricted by the laws of nature.  Look, I understand that we all struggle with prayer - what does it "do"?  Does it change things?  What about those we pray for who do not heal?  I'm not saying don't continue to ask these questions - but don't expect scientifically validated answers from studies that think they can somehow control prayer.




1. Mary Ann Savage left...
Sunday, 10 October 2004 10:19 pm

Prayer changes the pray-er


2. a reader left...
Wednesday, 13 October 2004 2:15 am

Yeah, that control group business has always bothered me. Not only are all sick people being prayed for as a general group, but I'd bet everyone in that control group also has one or more people praying for him or her by name, who just don't happen to be part of the experiment.

Lynn Gazis-Sax [lynngnews@alsirat.com]